Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Rook Roman Tub Faucet Trim with Hand Shower (Less Handles) - Chrome T67460-PCLHP BrizoCombining a contemporary, masculine edge with nods to early 1900s traditionalism, the Rook Bath Collection is an arresting, modern interpretation of a stately aesthetic. Customize the design with your choice of lever or cross handles. Includes 3 function H2< sub>Okinetic handshower: 1. 75 gpm @ 80 psi, 6. 6 L min @ 550 kPa Ceramic cartridge Trim only, must order rough R64707 separately Handles feature neodymium rare earth magnets to simplify
Combining a contemporary, masculine edge with nods to early-1900s traditionalism, the Rook Bath Collection is an arresting, modern interpretation of a stately aesthetic. Customize the design with your choice of lever or cross handles.
- Includes 3-function H<sub>2</sub>Okinetic® handshower: 1.75 gpm @ 80 psi, 6.6 L/min @ 550 kPa
- Ceramic cartridge
- Trim only, must order rough R64707 separately
- Handles feature neodymium rare earth magnets to simplify installation and provide secure, flush fit
- Accommodates up to 2 1/2" deck thickness
- 60" - 82" stretchable, finished metal hose
- MUST ORDER HANDLES SEPARATELY
- 4-hole installation
- Includes 3-function H<sub>2</sub>Okinetic handshower: 1.75 gpm @ 80 psi, 6.6 L/min @ 550 kPa
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 732 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Perfect for my body and fit preference, plus COTTON
Size: X-Large, Color: Set-unbl
Update: Different color packs fit differently. I've purchased two packages, one all-black and one black with the colorful waistbands. The all-black are a little smaller. IMO the all-black run a half to a full size small, and the black with the colorful waistbands run true to size.
Listen, all of our bodies and preferences are so different, but these are perfect for my body and my fit preference. They hit at my bellybutton and I would describe the length as short-boyshorts, but not hipsters. Most importantly, they're cotton, which my body reacts much better to these days.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 13, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good quality
Size: Medium, Color: Set-unbl
They fit perfectly and seem well made
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Will be buying more
Size: X-Large, Color: Set-unbl
LOVE THESE!
They’re so comfortable and stretchy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 24, 2026
★★★★★ 3
They're ok
Size: Large, Color: Set-mu2
These are ok. I'm 5'6", 150lbs. I got a large. The colors are fun. The waist band is comfortable, fits well, doesn't dig in, and sits high enough to not affect a my C-section scar, but they constantly ride up.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Cotton panties need to be the standard- these are amazing!
Color: C-multicolor(6 Pack), Size: Medium
SO comfortable!! I’ve never owned a pair of 95-100% cotton underwear and I’m never going back. These are so breathable, soft and well made for an affordable price! The lacey detail is so cute and feminine. I got the mediums cause I don’t like my underwear squeezing me but don’t want them too loose either. After washing and drying they fit nicely. They hit at waist as well which I love. Would definitely recommend!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 28, 2026