Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 13 - Jul 18
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Emax ECO II 2812 3-6S 930KV 1100KV Brushless MotorAre you looking to buy Emax ECO II Series 2812 Motors in Australia? Enhance the performance of your RC aircraft with the Emax ECOII 2812 brushless motor. Designed for versatility and efficiency, this motor delivers reliable power for a range of applications, from agile multirotors to high speed fixed wing planes. With its durable construction and precise engineering, the Emax ECOII 2812 is the ideal choice for hobbyists and enthusiasts seeking top
Are you looking to buy Emax ECO II Series 2812 Motors in Australia?
Enhance the performance of your RC aircraft with the Emax ECOII 2812 brushless motor. Designed for versatility and efficiency, this motor delivers reliable power for a range of applications, from agile multirotors to high-speed fixed-wing planes. With its durable construction and precise engineering, the Emax ECOII 2812 is the ideal choice for hobbyists and enthusiasts seeking top-tier performance and value.
Features
- Available in two KV variants: 930KV and 1100KV, offering versatility for various performance needs.
- Compatible with 3-6S LiPo batteries, providing flexible power options.
- Precision-engineered stator and rotor design ensure optimal efficiency and performance.
- Constructed with aluminum alloy for durability and efficient heat dissipation.
- Equipped with high-quality bearings for smooth operation and extended lifespan.
Specifications
- Model: Emax ECOII 2812
- Configuration: Brushless motor
- Stator Diameter: 28mm
- Stator Height: 12mm
- Weight: Typically around 70-80 grams
- Shaft Diameter: 4mm
- Voltage Range: 3-6S LiPo (11.1V - 22.2V)
- KV Rating:
- 930KV variant: Suitable for applications requiring balanced torque and RPM.
- 1100KV variant: Suitable for applications requiring higher RPM and less torque.
- Max Continuous Current: Typically around 20-25A
- Max Burst Current (10s): Typically around 30-35A
- Recommended ESC: Compatible with ESCs rated for the maximum continuous current and burst current of the motor.
- Recommended Propeller Size: Typically suitable for propellers in the range of 8-10 inches in diameter.
- Mounting Pattern: Standard 4-hole mounting pattern for easy installation.
Construction: - Aluminum alloy construction for durability and heat dissipation.
- Precision-engineered components for reliable performance.
- Bearings: High-quality bearings for smooth operation and longevity.
- Connector: Pre-soldered motor leads with bullet connectors for easy connection to the ESC.
- Compatibility: Suitable for a wide range of RC aircraft applications, including multirotors and fixed-wing planes.
Browse more
- Browse all 23XX Motors
- Browse all EMAX Motors
- Browse all Motors
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1125 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 2
Longtime Ironman Wearer -- I Hate This Watch
Color: Black
I've worn the old Ironman 100 Lap Watch for Years
I would still be wearing those watches if the Indigo on them didn't consistently fail.
My main requisite is large, easy to read digital display, and the ability to turn the Indiglo on 20 seconds a day once or twice to see time in dark.
If I could have found a simple watch with a large display made by any other reputable manufacturer I would have bought it instead. I have truly come to dislike Timex because their Indiglo fails so consistently, on (5) different Ironman's I've owned. Doubt this one'll be any better, viewing it a disposable purchase after a year. Unsurprisingly, Timex is an American company, all marketing no quality, and yes I'm an American, looking at something Casio Seiko, Swiss or Japanese made. They get fundamentals right in terms of quality.
The band on this is redesigned. Grippier. Tougher to adjust or put on, but more apt to stay on and not slide once on. I'm used to the old band, don't love or hate this new one. I will usually take my watch off while typing for a long time, not as easy to do with this, not a dealbreaker, can see the sense in making a swimming and exercise watchband a bit tougher.
I hate the branding on this watch. Bright red Ironman logo on both ends of the band near the watch. Even worse is the Timex and Ironman words ATOP the glass on the watch. This means they throw shadows down onto the watch face below the glass. This effect gets even worse with the magnification underwater. Inexcusable design flaw, simply so some corporation can self-advertise its products. The combination of these two sets of branding make the watch look cheap, gaudy, and inappropriate for any remotely formal wearing. This would not have been the case if it was understated in color scheme. Without the two red marks on the band, and the absolutely moronic decision to place the branding on the watch glass, you have something understated you could get away wearing all the time. Not with the branding. There are also two lines running horizontally above and below the time. I hate these when I'm looking at it underwater. Haven't tried the lap functions yet, I usually open lake swim, maybe the lines help with that, but for my use I hate them.
I'm 6'4" tall, people complain the watch is big, it feels to me if anything a bit undersized or the proper size, others may find it big. I would rather have a slightly larger size with bigger numbers.
Biggest plus is time SUPER easy to read. I'd love to be able to turn date off and only have time display and nothing else in some mode. I don't need to check the date 6 times a day. Love to have mode where I press one button, upper left say, and date shows for five seconds or something.
Indiglo about the same as old big Ironman 100, excellent--when it doesn't break which it almost always does. I have many of these watches where the time still shows but Indiglo never works, Timex themselves admitted to me this is a known problem.
The rounder face, versus rectangular, better looks, but wonder if it is optimal way to make most readable.
I would pass on this watch. I have always liked Ironman watches, but the branding is so bad, glass especially, and the absymal quality of Timex Indiglo, are unacceptable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2023
★★★★★ 3
Cool & functional
Color: Pink
Attractive watch. Simplistic, yet cannot understand everything without not having instructions. Watch did no come with instructions, which became hard to figure out all its functions.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Great watch
Color: Black/Digital/Green
Love this watch. Comfortable. reliable. Not too fancy. Inconspicuous. And all for a great price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent watch
Color: Black, Gray
Great watch. Waterproof and I use the timer all the time. I'm on my 3rd or 4th one over 20 to 25 years. When the battery dies, I just buy another one because at that point in time the band is usually also going bad.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Rugged Watch at Good Price
Color: Black, Gray
I originally wanted a G-Shock but I have a small wrist and G-Shocks come with cases that are too big for my 6.1 inch wrist. An alternative? I bought the Timex Ironman. It has a rugged look and many of the features of a G-Shock but at a lower price. Small wrist? Or don't want to spend the money for a G-Shock? This is your best bet.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026